My favorite chocolate chip cookies
March 6, 2011 at 7:54 pm (Cookies, Dessert, unrated, Website / blog)
I have a picture in my head of the perfect chocolate cookie. It’s got to be soft, but substantial. I don’t want to hear any crunch when I bite into it, and I don’t want the cookies to stick to my teeth. I don’t want my cookie to be to dry, but neither do I like a greasy cookie. And the sweetness level is important. There needs to be a nice balance of sweet, salty, and buttery. All other things being equal, I prefer a cookie with some height to a cookie that is totally flat. I haven’t yet found a recipe that makes my perfect chocolate chip cookie, but I’m working on it. I’ll document our experiments below.
First the results of other people’s experimentation:
I started by reading this chocolate chip cookie comparison on The Way the Cookie Crumbles Blog, as well as a follow-up. Here’s a summary of their results:
- Alton Brown’s The Chewy: It had a great butterscotch flavor, and a nice soft texture – tender without being too chewy or crisp. However, they were greasy.
- The New York Times recipe: It was soft, with just a bit of crispness to the edges, which I like. However, they were a little dry and bready, and didn’t have as much flavor as Alton’s. They definitely weren’t greasy though.
- Cook Illustrated’s Thick and Chewy recipe: These took chewy to the extreme. It was like cookie flavored bubble gum, although the cookie flavor was weak. I made them again, convinced that I must have done something wrong the first time, but I still couldn’t get excited about these cookies.
- Tollhouse: Dave wasn’t a fan of the Tollhouse cookies at all – too greasy, he says. I still like their flavor, which is intensely buttery. I also like the crispy edges and tender middles. But they could definitely benefit from some extra flour (which is how I made them for years, but I followed the recipe exactly this time).
- Cook’s Illustrated Perfect Chocolate Chip Cookies (May/June 2009): The cookies were really good. This wasn’t a side-by-side comparison, so it’s hard for me to say exactly where they stand, but they’re certainly in the upper echelon of chocolate chip cookies.
Here’s another taste test with an entirely different set of contestants. And here’s a ranking without too many comments. We also have to consider which chocolate chips to use or whether to use chips or just chop chocolate from a bar. The possibilities seem endless!
Now our own results:
In the last year Derek and I have tried two different recipes. The first was the CI recipe from May/June 2009, where you melt and brown the butter. Neither of us thought they were anywhere close to the ultimate chocolate chip cookie, but Derek liked them more than me. I wanted a softer texture. And I found that the flavor from the browned butter interfered with the basic chocolate chip cookie taste I was looking for.
The second recipe we tried was Jaay’s best ever cookies, but normal size not jumbo. I had made these once before and remember them being quite good. This time they didn’t come out quite as soft. Maybe I overcooked them or maybe the German flour is a bit different than American flour. They were still good, but not perfect. I made them with Ghiradelli 60% chocolate chips, which are quite large. Maybe it was the chips that were part of the problem. The cookies seemed to have too many chocolate chips. You mostly tasted chips rather than cookie.
Some more recipes to consider:
http://www.almostslowfood.com/?p=16
http://www.singforyoursupperblog.com/2011/02/22/everyones-favorite-chocolate-chip-cookie/
And a whole-wheat chocolate chip cookie “pie”:
http://www.101cookbooks.com/archives/whole-wheat-chocolate-chip-skillet-cookies-recipe.html
Some scientific notes:
I wonder if melting the butter makes the cookies greasier?
Curt McAdams said,
March 7, 2011 at 2:30 am
Thanks for trying the cookies from my site. I have found that making the cookies smaller changes them quite a bit, so I’ve gone to always making the larger cookies. I also switched to all Turbinado sugar.
I think the size difference changes the thickness, which changes the consistency of the cookies overall. I could easily be wrong, but it’s just what I’ve found.
captious said,
March 7, 2011 at 11:20 am
But you said in your post that they came out just as good when you made them normal-sized? In any case, I’m looking for a recipe that works as normal-sized cookies. What effect does all-turbinado have on the texture?
Curt McAdams said,
March 7, 2011 at 5:06 pm
The original was a long time ago now… I have found over time that it’s just harder to get the same consistency with smaller cookies. And people can always break them in two.
Instead of using brown and white sugar, I use Turbinado sugar (Sugar In The Raw is a brand of that type of sugar). It’s a larger grain sugar and makes the cookies a bit more coarse, I think, which I like.
Janelle said,
March 9, 2011 at 9:11 pm
A post after my own heart. It is actually the rare chocolate chip cookie that I really love – we all have our own ideas of what’s good I guess. I made the Good to the Grain recipe that 101cookbooks.com posted and – as far as taste – I’ve never had better. I followed the recipe exactly and used Valrhona chocolate. Texture-wise it was too crumbly for me, but I’m wondering if I try some WW Pastry flour next time? Also, I’ve had good results with subbing in some bread flour in cookies causing them to be more thick than flat.
captious said,
March 18, 2011 at 6:19 pm
Thanks Janelle. I’ll have to try these next.